get_roll

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Implicitly suggests read-only operation ('Get details'), but no annotations to confirm. Does not explicitly state side effects, authentication needs, or error scenarios. With no annotations, description bears full burden but only provides minimal behavioral insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose; parameter details are listed in docstring format which is clear but slightly verbose. Could be more concise while retaining essential info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get operation, description covers parameters adequately. Output schema exists but isn't shown; assuming it documents return format. Lacks information on rate limits or pagination, but acceptable for a single-entity retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description compensates by providing examples (e.g., 'o-abc12345' for cluster_id), default behavior for account_id (falls back to env var), and cloud options (aws/azure). Adds meaning beyond schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Get details of a specific Ocean cluster roll' with explicit support for AWS and Azure. Distinguishes from sibling tools like list_rolls and initiate_roll by specifying it's for a specific roll.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Identifies required parameters and optional account_id with default behavior. Implicitly differentiates from list_rolls (list) and initiate_roll (create) by context, but lacks explicit when-not or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.