waiting-on
Related Servers
Alternatives to waiting-on
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides persistent memory for AI agents, enabling context retention across sessions and supporting vibe-loop workflows where agent promises and deliverables are tracked and validated.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.24 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for tracking decision logs and open questions in AI-assisted projects, offering tools to fetch context, list decisions and open items, and draft new decisions.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents manage an Agent Inbox queue via natural language. It supports listing pending items, adding new URLs with notes, and marking items as reviewed or deleted.20 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for tracking issues across multiple AI agent sessions, enabling agents to file, claim, complete, review, and close issues with a web UI for monitoring.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that provides cross-project progress tracking tools (list, refresh, read, update, mark) for agents to query and manage work status across multiple tracked projects.-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
The alias between waiting_on_loops and waiting_on_list creates direct ambiguity, as they are the same operation. The three refresh tools are distinct but share the same verb prefix, which could cause misselection. Other tools are sufficiently differentiated.
All tools share the consistent 'waiting_on_' prefix, but the suffixes are a mix of nouns (loops, health, export) and verb phrases (draft_reply, lead_add, lead_bump), with no clear pattern. The alias also undermines naming distinctness.
With 12 tools, the server covers its domain without being overwhelming or insufficient. Each tool serves a distinct function except for the alias, and the count supports a focused scope.
The toolset covers listing, showing, refreshing, and basic lead management, but lacks operations to close or delete threads, send drafts, or remove leads. This leaves obvious gaps for a tracking system, limiting agent autonomy.