AEM DEV MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to AEM DEV MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for Adobe Experience Manager that provides 35+ REST/JSON-RPC API methods for complete content, component, asset, and template management. Enables AI-powered AEM automation through natural language interfaces with support for page operations, component CRUD, asset management, and publishing workflows.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Adobe Commerce Cloud projects via REST API and SSH for database queries, log reading, environment management, and more, with no PHP CLI required.1544 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Adobe Experience Platform and AEM content operations through a shared tool registry, exposing health checks, fragment search, sandbox management, dataset queries, and content fragment fetching via MCP and web interfaces.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-assisted management of Apache Tomcat, including start/stop, WAR deployment, log analysis, thread and heap dumps, and diagnostics.21 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets through the Author API. It allows users to browse folders, search for assets, retrieve detailed asset information, and perform bulk metadata updates using natural language.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables management of Mistral AI agents through MCP tools including creating, listing, searching, viewing details, and deleting agents. Integrates with Mistral API to provide agent management capabilities through natural language interactions.1-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Tools are clearly grouped by resource (bundles, components, configurations) with action-specific verbs, making most selections straightforward. The only mild ambiguities are bundle_refresh vs bundle_restart and the similar lifecycle actions across different resource types.
The server follows a consistent aem_<resource>_<action> pattern with snake_case throughout. Minor inconsistencies like aem_bundle_details vs aem_configuration_get and aem_logs_search vs singular resource prefixes slightly break the uniformity.
At 20 tools, the set is on the heavier side, especially when compared to typical MCP servers. However, the count is justified by the broad AEM OSGi administration scope covering bundles, components, configurations, logs, health, and Groovy scripting.
The tool surface covers most lifecycle operations for OSGi bundles, components, and configurations, along with logs, health checks, and Groovy execution. Notable gaps include bundle install/upload and package management, but existing tools cover the core development workflows well.