Skip to main content
Glama
arjshiv

Local Utilities MCP Server

by arjshiv

get_node_version

Check the Node.js version of your local environment to verify runtime compatibility and ensure proper execution of Node-based applications.

Instructions

Returns the Node.js version information of the environment running the MCP server.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The anonymous async handler function for the 'get_node_version' tool. It invokes getNodeVersionInfo(), formats the result as JSON, and returns it in the MCP response format.
    async () => {
      // Error handling simplified, process.version/versions are generally safe
      const versionInfo = getNodeVersionInfo();
      return {
        content: [{
          type: "text",
          text: JSON.stringify(versionInfo, null, 2) // Keep JSON for structured data
        }]
      };
    }
  • The registration function that defines and registers the 'get_node_version' tool with the MCP server, including name, description, and handler.
    export function registerNodeVersionTool(server: McpServer): void {
      server.tool(
        "get_node_version",
        "Returns the Node.js version information of the environment running the MCP server.",
        async () => {
          // Error handling simplified, process.version/versions are generally safe
          const versionInfo = getNodeVersionInfo();
          return {
            content: [{
              type: "text",
              text: JSON.stringify(versionInfo, null, 2) // Keep JSON for structured data
            }]
          };
        }
      );
    } 
  • TypeScript interface defining the shape of the Node.js version information returned by the helper function.
    interface INodeVersionInfo {
      nodeVersion: string;
      details: NodeJS.ProcessVersions;
    }
  • Helper function that retrieves the current Node.js version string and detailed versions object from the process object.
    export function getNodeVersionInfo(): INodeVersionInfo { // Export for testing
      return {
        nodeVersion: process.version,
        details: process.versions,
      };
    }
  • src/index.ts:22-22 (registration)
    Invocation of the registerNodeVersionTool function in the main server initialization, effectively registering the tool.
    registerNodeVersionTool(server);
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly indicates this is a read-only operation ('Returns'), but doesn't mention potential side effects, error conditions, or performance characteristics. The description is accurate but lacks depth about behavioral traits beyond the basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose without any wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a simple tool and front-loads the essential information immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, parameterless tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description provides adequate context about what the tool returns. However, it doesn't specify the format of the version information (e.g., string, object) or what specific details are included, leaving some ambiguity about the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already fully documents the input requirements. The description appropriately doesn't discuss parameters since none exist, earning a baseline score of 4 for not adding unnecessary information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Returns') and resource ('Node.js version information of the environment running the MCP server'), distinguishing it from siblings like get_hostname or get_public_ip. It precisely communicates what the tool does without being vague or tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (when you need Node.js version info), but doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_hostname or get_public_ip. There's no guidance on prerequisites, exclusions, or specific scenarios where this tool is preferred over others.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arjshiv/localutils-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server