Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenPapers

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables locally-first literature research through an MCP host by collecting sources, parsing documents, retrieving evidence, validating citations, and exporting research records in multiple formats.
      38
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving academic papers, author profiles, citation and reference networks, recommendations, and related metadata from the Semantic Scholar API through MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A stdio MCP server for traceable scholarly retrieval and evidence-grounded literature review, with deterministic provider fusion, conservative ID canonicalization, and provenance-preserving citation traversal.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search academic papers, explore citation and reference networks, retrieve author profiles and publications, and generate paper recommendations through a structured MCP interface.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A provider-neutral Web Search MCP server and CLI that combines live search, scholarly discovery, verified PDF downloads, URL normalization, multi-provider ranking, secure page fetching, caching, and citation-ready research evidence.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as extract_paper_facts vs extract_paper_claims vs verify_claim, and extract_training_parameters vs extract_training_recipe vs extract_training_recipe_from_url. The compare_* family and research_method/research_topic/build_research_report also blur boundaries, though descriptions provide some differentiation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_collection, list_collections, add_paper_to_collection, etc.). However, vector_search is noun-first rather than verb-first, and research_method/research_topic read as noun phrases rather than clear verb actions, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the surface area is well beyond the typical 3–15 scope and feels heavy for a single MCP server. While each tool has a narrow role, the large count risks cognitive overload and suggests excessive granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of research-paper workflows: retrieval, extraction, citation management, comparison, collections, repository/model/dataset lookup, and research-pack import/export. Minor gaps exist around paper updating/deletion and more explicit claim-verification workflows, but the core domain is well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues