Skip to main content
Glama
arinspunk

Claude Talk to Figma MCP

by arinspunk

set_auto_layout

Set auto layout properties on any Figma node, including direction, padding, spacing, alignment, and wrap behavior. Adjust layout parameters like padding, item spacing, and alignment axes to precisely control node arrangement.

Instructions

Configure auto layout properties for a node in Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nodeIdYesThe ID of the node to configure auto layout
layoutModeYesLayout direction
paddingTopNoTop padding in pixels
paddingBottomNoBottom padding in pixels
paddingLeftNoLeft padding in pixels
paddingRightNoRight padding in pixels
itemSpacingNoSpacing between items in pixels
primaryAxisAlignItemsNoAlignment along primary axis
counterAxisAlignItemsNoAlignment along counter axis
layoutWrapNoWhether items wrap to new lines
strokesIncludedInLayoutNoWhether strokes are included in layout calculations
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states it configures properties. It does not disclose side effects, error conditions, or constraints (e.g., behavior when layoutMode is NONE).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with purpose, but could be more structured without sacrificing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 11 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain return values, partial updates, or parameter interactions (e.g., padding relevance per layoutMode).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the parameter descriptions already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Configure' and the resource 'auto layout properties for a node', distinguishing it from sibling tools like set_node_properties or create_frame.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like set_node_properties, no prerequisites (e.g., node must be a frame), and no exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arinspunk/claude-talk-to-figma-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server