Previous Track
mpv_prevGo back to the previous track in the media playlist, enabling backwards navigation through your queue.
Instructions
Go back to the previous track in the playlist.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
mpv_prevGo back to the previous track in the media playlist, enabling backwards navigation through your queue.
Go back to the previous track in the playlist.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description indicates a state change (changing current track), consistent with readOnlyHint=false. No contradictions; adequate for the simple action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, concise sentence with no extra words. Perfectly front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with zero parameters and no output schema, the description fully explains its function. No additional context needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; schema coverage is 100%. Baseline 4 applies as description adds clear purpose without needing parameter details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'go back' and the resource 'previous track in the playlist', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like mpv_next.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when navigating playlist backwards. No explicit when-not or alternatives, but the action is simple and self-explanatory.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arijit-gogoi/mpv-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server