Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to package-truth

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Verifies npm packages for security risks before installation, checking advisories, install scripts, typosquatting, and other factors, providing safe/block verdicts.
      1
      93 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to check package names and versions for allow/warn/deny verdicts, scan project lockfiles for known-malicious packages and critical advisories, and suggest safe versions across npm, PyPI, crates.io, and Go before manifests are edited.
      360 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers and AI coding agents to vet npm packages before installation by checking existence, lookalike names, package age, install scripts, maintainers, downloads, and advisories, returning GO, RISKY, FAKE, or MISSING. It also scans a project's package.json for worst-first dependency verdicts and can run as a CLI or stdio MCP server.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to look up package versions, scan for vulnerabilities, and analyze dependencies across multiple registries (npm, Maven, PyPI, etc.) using exact version recommendations for security.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and CI to vet npm dependencies before they reach the lockfile, flagging hallucinated, slopsquatted, or otherwise risky packages with evidence-backed verdicts.
      3
      101 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform read-only pre-install checks for npm, pip, uv, npx, and uvx targets or MCP servers, returning known install traps, tested fixes, warnings, malicious-package denials, or no known issues. It also supports searching tested recipes and reporting leaf packages.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools are clearly distinct: check_manifest validates dependency files, get_advisories provides detailed advisory info for a specific package version, and check_packages performs bulk registry checks. While both check_manifest and check_packages can surface advisories, their inputs and purposes differ (file text vs. registry list), so ambiguity is minimal.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: check_manifest, get_advisories, check_packages. The verbs (check, get) are descriptive and the nouns (manifest, advisories, packages) clearly indicate the target.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is ideal for the server's focused purpose of package verification and security. Each tool serves a distinct need (manifest scanning, bulk checking, advisory lookup) without unnecessary overlap or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the core domain comprehensively: manifest validation, bulk package checks (existence, latest, deprecated, advisories, license, age), and detailed advisory queries. For a read-only package truth service, there are no obvious missing operations or dead ends.