Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
check_compatibilityA

Whether code under each of up to 100 licenses or SPDX expressions (MIT OR GPL-3.0-only, GPL-2.0-only WITH Classpath-exception-2.0) may be included in a project under yours (an SPDX id, or 'proprietary'): yes, no or check, with OSADL's reason. Worst first.

license_infoA

Identifies up to 20 licenses however they are written ("Apache License 2.0", "GPLv3", "New BSD", deprecated SPDX ids): SPDX id and name, OSI approved, FSF free, copyleft class and source-disclosure duty (OSADL), links to the text and OSADL's obligations checklist.

package_licensesA

Looks up the licenses of up to 50 packages (npm, PyPI, crates.io, Go, Maven, NuGet; a version, or the latest) and, with project, whether each fits your license (yes, no, check). Copyleft ones are flagged. Worst first.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: identifying license texts, checking license compatibility, and looking up package licenses. No overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: check_compatibility, license_info, package_licenses. The naming is predictable and clear.

Tool Count5/5

With only 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its purpose of license checking. Each tool is essential and there is no bloat or missing core functionality.

Completeness5/5

The three tools cover the full lifecycle of license checking: identifying licenses, verifying compatibility, and fetching package licenses. No obvious gaps for the stated domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues