Skip to main content
Glama
arhancanli

internet-standards-mcp

by arhancanli
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to internet-standards-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rfc-mcp

      vitkuz573
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first, read-only analysis of IETF RFCs with pinned content-addressed snapshots, byte-exact citations, and RFC 2119/8174 requirement extraction. Provides tools, resources, and prompts for resolving, reading, searching, comparing, and verifying RFC content with provenance.
      6 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • RFC MCP Server

      mjpitz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables programmatic access to IETF RFC documents, allowing users to fetch, search, and extract specific sections from RFCs.
      3
      30 npm
      19
      Apache 2.0

    • IETF RFC MCP Server

      acquo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides LLM-based access to IETF documents such as RFCs, Internet-Drafts, STD/BCP/FYI series, and errata through a Model Context Protocol server.
      MIT

    • agentic-rag

      trentmilam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables cited, revision-aware retrieval over real IETF RFC chunks with zero LLM in the answer path, including graph-based supersession resolution and relationship queries via MCP tools.
      MIT

    • rfc-server

      xiaobenyang-com
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for obtaining, parsing and reading RFC documents from the ietf.org website, providing programmatic interactive tools.
      3
      2
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: IANA registry lookup vs. RFC discovery, metadata retrieval, and section text extraction. There is no meaningful overlap between any two tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase with underscores styles vary between object+verb (iana_lookup), object+noun (rfc_info, rfc_section), and verb+object (search_rfcs). The pattern is not perfectly uniform but remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 4 tools, the server is compact but covers the core references for internet standards. Slightly thin, but each tool serves a necessary, non-redundant function.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers IANA lookups, RFC searching, metadata validation, and section-level text with errata. Missing full RFC text retrieval or a registry listing, but the main workflows are covered without major dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources