Skip to main content
Glama
arhancanli

contact-check

Related Servers

Alternatives to contact-check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify postal addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers against Melissa's Global Verification APIs before acting on the data, including batch verification and a per-session call budget to prevent runaway costs.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven data quality operations such as validation, enrichment, and deduplication for customer data fields including email, address, phone, and LinkedIn profiles through natural language interactions.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses in real-time, checking syntax, DNS, MX records, and SMTP handshake, returning verdicts and deliverability scores without sending actual emails.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables validating and enriching phone numbers, returning validity, international/national formats, carrier, line type, and country/location data.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to validate email addresses through RFC 5321 syntax checks, MX record lookups, a 182,000-domain disposable blacklist, role-account detection, and an optional SMTP handshake. Runs locally via npx or as a hosted HTTP endpoint, returning explainable per-check scores at zero per-lookup API cost.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Validates phone numbers and provides country calling codes, enabling AI agents to look up international dialing codes and filter by country name, ISO code, or calling code.
      15 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a completely distinct contact channel: addresses, emails, and phone numbers. There is no overlap in purpose or output, so an agent can reliably select the right tool based on the input type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tool names follow the exact same check_<plural noun> pattern using snake_case. The naming is uniform and predictable, making the set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a contact-checking server. Each tool covers one major contact method without unnecessary bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the three core contact data types—address, email, and phone—with validation and formatting details. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a batch/combined contact check or support for other contact identifiers, but the surface is coherent and practical for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues