Skip to main content
Glama
arhancanli

citation-check

by arhancanli
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to citation-check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • bib-enrich-mcp

      haoxiangsnr
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automatically enriches BibTeX citations with missing metadata (DOI, venue, etc.) from arXiv, DBLP, and CrossRef via an MCP server for AI assistants.
      2
      MIT

    • ColabAI MCP Server

      AhmedCoolProjects
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.
      3
      12 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have distinct primary purposes: batch-checking references, checking retractions, and looking up individual works. However, there is minor overlap because check_references also flags retractions and lookup_work also returns retraction notices, so an agent might hesitate between tools for retraction-related queries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_references, check_retractions, lookup_work. The verbs differ ('check' vs 'lookup') but that reflects semantic intent, and there is no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With just 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped for citation verification. Each tool covers a distinct, necessary function and there is no bloat, making the count perfectly appropriate for the narrow domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying reference lists, batch-checking retraction status, and retrieving detailed publication records. No obvious gaps exist for the stated citation-checking purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources