citation-check
Related Servers
Alternatives to citation-check
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and researchers to verify BibTeX entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, arXiv and other sources using identifier-first, explainable multi-signal matching. It reports metadata consistency, conflicts, and ambiguous or missing records, and can apply high-confidence field updates non-destructively with backups.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to verify bibliographic records and BibTeX metadata consistency by resolving DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers and scoring candidates across multiple scholarly sources with explainable, multi-signal matching. It reports structured provider outcomes and metadata conflicts without destructively editing the source bibliography.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and researchers to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency, convert DOI, PMID, PMCID, or arXiv identifiers into BibTeX, and review explainable multi-source matches without destructive edits.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and researchers to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency across multiple sources, perform identifier-first lookups, and produce explainable, non-destructive BibTeX checks.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to check BibTeX records for bibliographic existence and metadata consistency by querying identifier-first providers like Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, DBLP, and arXiv and scoring title, author, year, venue, and page evidence. It returns explainable outcomes such as matches, ambiguous or not-found entries, and identifier conflicts, while keeping edits non-destructive unless explicitly applied.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency in BibTeX files through identifier-first lookups and explainable multi-source matching without destructive edits. It surfaces structured outcomes for missing, ambiguous, or conflicting references and supports non-destructive, high-confidence updates.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have distinct primary purposes: batch-checking references, checking retractions, and looking up individual works. However, there is minor overlap because check_references also flags retractions and lookup_work also returns retraction notices, so an agent might hesitate between tools for retraction-related queries.
All tool names follow the same lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_references, check_retractions, lookup_work. The verbs differ ('check' vs 'lookup') but that reflects semantic intent, and there is no mixing of conventions.
With just 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped for citation verification. Each tool covers a distinct, necessary function and there is no bloat, making the count perfectly appropriate for the narrow domain.
The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying reference lists, batch-checking retraction status, and retrieving detailed publication records. No obvious gaps exist for the stated citation-checking purpose.