Skip to main content
Glama
arhancanli

citation-check

by arhancanli
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to citation-check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • starbuck-mcp

      tiagojct
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify manuscript references against public scholarly records, checking that cited works exist, match their citations, and have not been retracted or flagged. It also lets an agent gather the best source passages for each citing sentence and record its own claim-support verdicts back into the report.
      4
      MIT

    • RefSentry

      LloydPhuc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.
      MIT
    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • CiteCheck MCP

      lucasgris
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing of every citation in a LaTeX or Markdown manuscript (English or Portuguese) against the actual passage in the cited PDF, verifying quotes literally, fetching sources from local folders, Zotero, arXiv and open-access APIs, and flagging bibliography problems such as retractions or missing DOIs. It also drafts and safely applies approved rewrites or new evidence-backed paragraphs in the .tex file with validation, encoding preservation and backups.
      19
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have distinct primary purposes: batch-checking references, checking retractions, and looking up individual works. However, there is minor overlap because check_references also flags retractions and lookup_work also returns retraction notices, so an agent might hesitate between tools for retraction-related queries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_references, check_retractions, lookup_work. The verbs differ ('check' vs 'lookup') but that reflects semantic intent, and there is no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With just 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped for citation verification. Each tool covers a distinct, necessary function and there is no bloat, making the count perfectly appropriate for the narrow domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: verifying reference lists, batch-checking retraction status, and retrieving detailed publication records. No obvious gaps exist for the stated citation-checking purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources