Codex Control Plane MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Codex Control Plane MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute local commands and multi-step workflows with durable checkpoints, operator controls, and safe resume/revise capabilities. It also provides local web and YouTube research tools, with optional Windows UI automation.29 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables durable bidirectional handoffs between any MCP client and OpenAI Codex Desktop tasks, with persistent callbacks, acknowledgements, and session-scoped state across restarts.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to execute formal, stateful workflows with typed contracts, postcondition enforcement, and structured retry logic.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first multi-agent delegation and approval control for Codex via MCP, with persistent task DAG, isolated worktrees, and a web console.141MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables durable multi-agent workflow runs for Codex with a live terminal dashboard, restartable agents, and bug-finding templates, all controllable through natural language.689 npm63MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables heavy computation and data processing tasks in Claude Desktop, including complex SQL operations, large-scale data transformations, and resilient batch processing with automatic retry mechanisms.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions that specify when to use it and what to do next. Overlaps like codex_execute_plan vs codex_approve_plan are resolved by marking the former as a compatibility wrapper. No two tools perform the same action.
All tools follow the consistent pattern codex_<verb>_<noun> with lowercase and underscores. Verbs like get, list, start, submit are used uniformly, and there is no mixing of styles.
38 tools is high but each serves a distinct operation within the control plane domain, covering workflow lifecycle, diagnostics, chat, worker, and project management. A few redundancies exist for backward compatibility, but overall the count is justified by the breadth of functionality.
The tool surface covers the complete lifecycle: health checks, diagnostics, planning, execution, review, chat management, project discovery, and cleanup (archive/unarchive). Missing operations like deletion are not essential for a control plane, and the set provides no dead ends for common workflows.