Skip to main content
Glama
aresyn

Codex Control Plane MCP

by aresyn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex Control Plane MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Codex Control Plane MCP

      Chiarap76619
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to drive Codex Desktop and codex-app-server as a durable asynchronous worker for long-running tasks, with polling, approvals, Plan Mode workflows, retry safety, diagnostics, and final reporting. It also provides recovery, queueing, and repair tools for reliable local automation.
      -

    • Codex Control Plane MCP

      janp337
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to submit and manage durable, asynchronous Codex Desktop tasks, including polling, approvals, Plan Mode workflows, and final reports. It provides retry-safe operations, recovery, diagnostics, and local state for reliable long-running automation.
      -

    • Codex Control Plane MCP

      dejager20
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to drive Codex Desktop as a durable asynchronous worker for long-running tasks, including submitting operations or workflows, polling status, managing approvals and Plan Mode, and reading final reports. It also provides retry safety, duplicate-prompt protection, restart recovery, and diagnostics for reliable local automation.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions that specify when to use it and what to do next. Overlaps like codex_execute_plan vs codex_approve_plan are resolved by marking the former as a compatibility wrapper. No two tools perform the same action.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent pattern codex_<verb>_<noun> with lowercase and underscores. Verbs like get, list, start, submit are used uniformly, and there is no mixing of styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    38 tools is high but each serves a distinct operation within the control plane domain, covering workflow lifecycle, diagnostics, chat, worker, and project management. A few redundancies exist for backward compatibility, but overall the count is justified by the breadth of functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the complete lifecycle: health checks, diagnostics, planning, execution, review, chat management, project discovery, and cleanup (archive/unarchive). Missing operations like deletion are not essential for a control plane, and the set provides no dead ends for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources