Skip to main content
Glama

tasks_ready

Read-onlyIdempotent

List actionable, unblocked tasks for a project or session oldest-first and show blocked tasks with their open blockers. Pass a plan slug to list that plan's steps instead.

Instructions

List the actionable (ready) tasks for a project -- open tasks with no unfinished blocker -- oldest first, plus the blocked tasks with their still-open blockers. By default plan-step tasks are excluded; pass plan= to list that plan's steps instead.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
planNooptional plan slug: return that plan's ready/blocked step tasks instead of the default (non-plan) queue
projectNoproject slug; defaults to the bound session's project
sessionNothe session to act as: the name session_start returned, the cc/<id> or cx/<id> on your briefing's 'Seam session' line, or a session ULID. It scopes and credits this call. Defaults to this connection's session; pass it on every call when session_start reports the connection as stateless

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.7.4
    • addedInput schema / properties / session
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "the session to act as: the name session_start returned, the cc/<id> or cx/<id> on your briefing's 'Seam session' line, or a session ULID. It scopes and credits this call. Defaults to this connection's session; pass it on every call when session_start reports the connection as stateless",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world, so safety is covered. The description adds non-obvious behavior beyond that: results are ordered oldest first, and blocked tasks are included alongside their still-open blockers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the primary behavior, then the default/override rule. Every clause carries information; nothing is padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema, the description adequately conveys what the return set contains and how it is ordered. It omits anything about result limits or pagination, a minor gap given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters are already documented with defaults and scoping semantics. The description restates the plan parameter's effect but adds no format or syntax detail beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb+resource ('List the actionable (ready) tasks for a project') and defines the exact selection criteria (open tasks with no unfinished blocker) plus what else is returned (blocked tasks with their blockers). This distinguishes it from siblings like tasks_list, tasks_claim, and tasks_release.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the default behavior and the escape hatch: plan-step tasks are excluded by default, and passing plan=<slug> switches to that plan's steps. It does not name sibling alternatives such as tasks_list for a fuller view, so it stops short of explicit when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.