Skip to main content
Glama
archonics

Archonics MCP Audit Server

Official
by archonics

Related Servers

Alternatives to Archonics MCP Audit Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Score your agent's governance (0-100), lint MCP tool definitions, and estimate costs across all major models. Free diagnostic tools with no API key needed. Expert skill files on governance, economics, and system architecture available with free tier.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Context intelligence for AI coding sessions. 7 MCP tools to score, compare, compress, build, and scan prompts across 9 AI tools. Rule-based, <5ms/prompt, all analysis runs locally.
      46
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides real-time monitoring of AI agents, context, usage limits, workflows, files, Git, tests, builds, errors, secrets, and model-economy advice for tools like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, with 30 MCP tools for comprehensive observability.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents observability over their own tool calls, enabling auditing, cost tracking, latency analysis, and alerting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP tools for video transcoding, document conversion, and multi-step pipelines — callable by any AI agent.
      12
      429 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct audit dimension: context packing, system prompt, and tool definition. There is no overlap in purpose, making it clear which tool to use for a given issue.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'audit_<target>' pattern using snake_case, which is predictable and clearly indicates the function of each tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is appropriate for a specialized audit server, covering the core areas of context, system prompt, and tool definition without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers three critical audit aspects, but lacks a tool for full tool-set coherence or evaluation, which is noted as a paid-tier feature. Minor gap in free tier completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues