maestro_abort

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description discloses the tool aborts sessions, returns a dict with success and message, and that sessions auto-expire. Could mention more about side effects, but sufficient for a simple operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with Args, Returns, and Example sections. Slightly verbose but clear and front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, parameter, return value, and example thoroughly for a simple tool. No gaps given the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description compensates by defining 'session_id: Session ID to abort' and showing usage in an example. Adds value beyond schema's minimal title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Abort and cleanup a MAESTRO session' with a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'maestro_start_session' or 'maestro_answer'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use for canceling an in-progress interview and freeing resources, and mentions automatic expiration after 1 hour. Lacks explicit exclusions or alternatives, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.