Scored across 38 tools
Several write tools overlap heavily around the same workflows: write_account_close vs. write_account_remove_liquidity/swap/deleverage/withdraw, write_account_add_liquidity vs. write_account_deposit/borrow, and write_account_automations vs. write_account_automations_delta. The descriptions do explicitly cross-reference and say which to prefer, which prevents total confusion, but there are more than one or two ambiguous pairs an agent must carefully parse.
Nearly all tools follow a readable read_/write_ prefix with snake_case and a predictable resource_action structure (read_account_info, write_account_deposit, read_pool_list). Minor deviations like dev_send and the noun-first read_wallet_points versus read_point_leaderboard keep it from being perfect, but the set is broadly consistent.
With 38 tools, the surface is very heavy for an agent to navigate in one server, especially given the dense multi-step DeFi workflows. While a complex protocol may justify many operations, this exceeds the comfortable 3–15 range and includes several tools whose functions could be consolidated.
The surface covers account lifecycle (create, deposit, withdraw, borrow, repay, close), LP operations, staking, automations, lender pool deposit/redeem, wallet approvals, upgrades, strategy discovery, points, PnL, and history. A few edges like account deletion/transfer or direct reward-claim tooling are absent, but core workflows appear well covered.
