Skip to main content
Glama
arbengine

mailbox-mcp

by arbengine

Related Servers

Alternatives to mailbox-mcp

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for semantic search and retrieval of indexed Slack messages stored in Qdrant using Cohere reranking via AWS Bedrock. It enables users to search through Slack history, retrieve full message threads, and access channel or user statistics through natural language.
    5
    -

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    MCP server that lets AI agents create reviewable physical mail drafts, validate quotes, and pay for postage via MPP or x402 protocols.
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An open-source MCP server for sending physical mail (letters, postcards, certified mail) directly from AI agents, with per-piece payment and no account signup needed.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Official MCP server for Shipmail, enabling agents to manage domains, mailboxes, messages, threads, webhooks, and suppressions via natural language.
    100
    481 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for Sendook - an AI email communication platform. Enables AI agents to send and receive emails, manage inboxes, threads, and webhooks programmatically.
    16
    MIT

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 29 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action (packages, inbound mail, outbound mail, facilities, rules, etc.) with clear boundaries. Even related tools like add_note and update_action have clearly separated purposes (package notes vs action request notes). There is no overlapping functionality that would cause confusion.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., get_package, list_inbound_mail, send_outbound_mail, update_webhook). The naming style is uniform across all 29 tools, making the API predictable and easy to navigate for an agent.

Tool Count4/5

At 29 tools, the count is above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but fits the comprehensive domain of mail and package management. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy, and the scope justifies the number.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers core workflows (create, read, list, request actions) but lacks explicit update and delete operations for several resources like rules, packages, and webhooks. Notable gaps include no update_rule, delete_rule, delete_package, or delete_webhook, which may cause dead ends when agents need to modify or remove resources.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues