gittr-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gittr-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA secure and scalable Git MCP server giving AI agents powerful version control for local and (soon) serverless environments.177 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server to provide AI agents money functionalities via Nostr and Cashu.671 npm17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceLocal Git MCP server exposing 29 tools that let AI clients manage repositories, commits, branches, remotes, and advanced git operations via natural language.29MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that equips AI agents with dev workflow tools including GitHub project management, conventional commits, visual regression testing, Jira/Confluence integration, and a persistent memory knowledge graph.11 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools for interacting with Git repositories, enabling AI assistants to manage repositories, branches, commits, and files through a standardized interface.3,597 npm1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to perform GitHub operations like creating repositories, issues, and commits through natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 75 tools
Several tool boundaries are unclear: createPR and createPRViaGittrCLI both create PRs, getFile overlaps with bridgeGetFileContent, and closeIssue/reopenIssue/markPullRequestMerged are wrappers around publishStatusForRoot. There are also explicit aliases (findReposByGithub/findReposBySource, deleteRepo/softDeleteRepo) that further blur the surface.
The vast majority use a readable camelCase verb_noun pattern (listIssues, createRepo, publishRepoAnnouncement). Minor deviations like myRepos, bridgeRepoExists, createRelease (which doesn't actually create), and createPRViaGittrCLI prevent a perfect score.
75 tools is an extreme surface for a single MCP server, far past the 25+ threshold. Even granting the broad gittr/Nostr domain, the count will make tool selection and model context unwieldy.
The surface covers repo lifecycle, issues/PRs, comments, bounties, releases, social actions, auth, and security audits, so core workflows have no dead ends. Minor gaps exist, such as no repo metadata update/remove-collaborator tool and release tooling split awkwardly across listReleases/listForgeReleases/createRelease.