Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gittr-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure and scalable Git MCP server giving AI agents powerful version control for local and (soon) serverless environments.
      202 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Local Git MCP server exposing 29 tools that let AI clients manage repositories, commits, branches, remotes, and advanced git operations via natural language.
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with Git repositories, enabling AI assistants to manage repositories, branches, commits, and files through a standardized interface.
      4,277 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 75 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools overlap heavily: createPR vs createPRViaGittrCLI, listReleases vs listForgeReleases vs fetchForgeReleases, publishSoftwareAnnounce vs announceSoftwareFromForgeRelease, and pushToBridge vs importRemoteToBridge vs mirrorRepo. Several aliases (deleteRepo/findReposByGithub) and multiple bounty flows add to the confusion. An agent must read long warnings to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use lowerCamelCase consistently, so there is no casing chaos. However, the verb+noun pattern is not uniform: some tools are noun-first (bountyCreateWithdraw, bountyRelease), and verb choices vary widely (fetch, announce, explore, star, watch, merge, softDelete). Aliases and prefixed names (bridge*) are minor deviations.

    Tool Count2/5

    75 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range and includes many alias, low-level, and niche tools. While the platform is broad, the count forces agents to sift through redundant options and raises the risk of misselection. It should be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle coverage is strong: repos (create/get/list/delete/fork), issues (create/list/get/close/reopen/comments), PRs (create/list/get/merge/comments), bounties, releases, paywall, and bridge operations are all present. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no updateIssue, no removeCollaborator, createRelease is a stub), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow