Skip to main content
Glama
aqamahn

Tenable OT Security MCP Server

by aqamahn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Tenable OT Security MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tenable-mcp

      nguyenthdat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes Tenable security operations as MCP tools for AI-powered security workflows, enabling asset, vulnerability, scan, plugin, and tag management via natural language.
      17
      MIT

    • Tenable Identity Exposure MCP

      knethteo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes the Tenable Identity Exposure (TIE) REST API as tools for LLM clients, enabling queries on security profiles, activity timelines, AD objects, and more.
      15
      5
      MIT

    • OpenCTI MCP Server

      Space-C0wboy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage OpenCTI threat intelligence data, including indicators, observables, reports, malware, and more, with read-only and optional write operations.
      MIT

    • trane-mcp

      NoBanks
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with read access to Trane Tracer SC+ building automation systems for inventory and telemetry retrieval.
      8
      MIT

    • tenable-mcp-server

      tarhou
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Tenable Vulnerability Management and the Tenable One platform, enabling LLMs to query assets, vulnerabilities, scans, exposure metrics, attack paths, and more via natural language.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but the large number of query/list variants (e.g., query_attack_pathways vs get_communication_paths, query_vulnerabilities vs query_vulnerability_clusters) creates some potential for misselection. Descriptions are detailed enough to resolve most ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, query_, export_, find_), with only a few harmless outliers like summarize_environment and tenable_ot_status. The naming convention is highly predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 59 tools, the set is far beyond the recommended 3-15 range and feels heavy, with many archived variants and overlapping query tools. While the OT security domain is broad, the count is excessive and could overwhelm an agent.

    Completeness2/5

    The read-only surface is broad, but the server references write tools like update_policy and create_tag_group that are not actually provided, leaving lifecycle gaps. There is also no tool to execute scans, only to view scan configurations. The missing write operations and scan execution are significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources