Appo MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Appo MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server designed for React Native and Expo development that provides specialized tools for project scaffolding, architectural best practices, and troubleshooting. It enables AI assistants to guide users through setup, navigation configuration, and CI/CD processes using modern stacks like NativeWind and Zustand.134-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents hands, eyes and a mechanic's ear for React Native development.912 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives LLMs access to up-to-date mobile SDK documentation, package registry info, and GitHub issues.669 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents hands-on control of a live React Native app, enabling UI taps, screenshots, UI/component trees, native logs, and JS/React profiling to debug, verify fixes, and diagnose performance issues.162 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server enables real-time debugging and inspection of running React Native apps, providing access to console logs, errors, network requests, navigation state, storage, and performance profiling.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides utilities for web developers to automate API integration, convert Figma designs to code, and optimize development workflows with tools for asset management and code generation.2814 npm38Mozilla Public 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Some tools have clear boundaries (create_app, list_apps, set_icon), but several overlap in purpose: generate_hook, generate_component, and scaffold_feature all produce SDK integration code, and diagnose_issue, get_fix_recipe, and get_rejection all deal with app rejection/diagnosis. The descriptions help somewhat, but an agent could easily confuse generate_hook with generate_component or diagnose_issue with get_fix_recipe.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (validate_setup, generate_hook, list_apps, configure_app, set_icon, publish_app, get_app_overview, send_push). Minor deviations exist: trigger_resubmission and generate_universal_links are longer but still verb-based, and scaffold_feature is a verb_noun pair. Overall the pattern is predictable.
21 tools is on the higher end but reasonable for a server covering both SDK code generation and app lifecycle management. The count is slightly heavy, but each tool addresses a distinct aspect of the Appo platform, and the two clusters (code generation vs. app management) justify the size.
The server covers the core app lifecycle well: create, list, configure, set icon/permissions, publish, unpublish, preview, build status, rejection handling, and push. Minor gaps exist: there's no delete_app or update_app (only configure_app for content fields), and no tool for managing team members or viewing analytics. The code generation side is also somewhat redundant but complete.