Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to @applyra/mcp-server

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Scans websites to evaluate agent-readiness and produce an ASO Score Report across 34 signals, helping improve discoverability, trust, and interoperability for AI agents.
    5
    440 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides App Store Optimization tools for AI agents, enabling app lookup, keyword research, ASO audit, review mining, and revenue estimation across iOS and Google Play.
    43
    203 npm
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to query live App Store and Google Play data — keyword demand, rank history, top charts, competitor sets, reviews and ratings — across 100+ countries, directly inside a chat instead of a dashboard. Exposes 35 read-only tools covering app search, ASO keyword profiling, ranking trajectories, and worldwide market comparisons through a remote OAuth-authenticated endpoint.
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables App Store and Google Play keyword rank tracking, competitor comparisons, and AI visibility checks through natural language, without requiring store credentials.
    85
    32 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to research App Store keywords with popularity and difficulty scores, track daily rankings across 59 storefronts, find competitor keyword gaps, optimize metadata, and review App Store Connect performance. Read tools only inspect the signed-in account, while write tools manage tracked apps, keywords, competitors, and saved lists mid-conversation.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides live App Store and Google Play data as MCP tools, enabling search, app details, reviews, charts, estimates, and more through natural language.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 25 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: tracking, inspecting, ranking history, metadata checks, simulations, competitors, autocomplete, niche analysis, and charts are clearly separated. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference related tools to prevent misuse, so even with many list-history tools the boundaries remain unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

Almost all tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g. list_applications, track_keywords, get_aso_health). The single outlier is top_charts, which omits the verb prefix, but the rest of the set is highly predictable.

Tool Count3/5

25 tools cover a broad ASO feature set but sit at the heavy end of the range, with many separate list/get tools for tracked items, inspections, simulations, analyses, and history. The count feels borderline for a single server even though each tool has a distinct purpose.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows are covered for keywords, competitors, metadata, and research, but application lifecycle management is incomplete: add_application and list_applications exist with no update or delete counterpart. Agents cannot remove or modify a tracked app, which is a notable gap for the domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues