Skip to main content
Glama

Check for a reply to an earlier ask / request_ack (non-blocking by default)

check_reply

Check if a human replied to a question sent via ask or request_ack. Returns responded status and value (yes/no/ack) using the saved message_id.

Instructions

Look up whether the human has replied to a question or ack you sent earlier — use it to resume after ask/request_ack returned a timeout, or after your client cancelled the blocking call. Pass the message_id (and topic) you got back from that call. Returns immediately by default; set wait_seconds to briefly long-poll. Returns { responded, value?, replied_at? } — value is "yes"/"no" (a yes/no question) or "ack". For an approval gate, only proceed when value === "yes". Replies are kept only ~30 minutes after the original message was sent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicNoTopic the original message was sent to. Defaults to the BLIPR_TOPIC env var.
message_idYesThe message_id returned by a prior ask / request_ack call.
wait_secondsNoSeconds to long-poll for an answer (0 = instant check; default 0).
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses default non-blocking behavior, long-poll option, return value structure with detailed field meanings, and 30-minute retention policy. No annotations present, so description bears full burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single paragraph is efficient and well-structured, with key information front-loaded. Could be slightly more structured but no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description fully explains return values. Covers all parameters, usage context, timing, and retention. Complete and self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3. Description adds value by explaining message_id origin, topic default, and wait_seconds purpose, plus return value interpretation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks if a human replied to an earlier ask/request_ack, and distinguishes from siblings by referencing those as prior calls.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use after ask/request_ack timeout or cancellation, and explains long-poll option via wait_seconds, but does not explicitly list when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/applogico/blipr-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server