Skip to main content
Glama
appknox

Appknox MCP Server

Official
by appknox
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Appknox MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MobSF MCP Server

      il-il1
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Node.js-based Model Context Protocol implementation that provides a standardized interface for integrating Mobile Security Framework's security analysis capabilities into automated workflows and third-party tools.
      71
      24
      -

    • va-pentest-mcp

      banhongit7
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for automated security vulnerability assessment, combining OWASP Dependency-Check dependency scanning with custom code vulnerability detection, and generating detailed HTML and JSON reports.
      -

    • MCPwner

      nedlir
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for security research automation, integrating multiple security testing tools into LLM-driven workflows for secret scanning, static analysis, and vulnerability discovery.
      55
      Apache 2.0

    • PS_MobSF_MCP_Server

      pullkitsan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This is an MCP (Model Context Protocol) compatible tool that allows MobSF (Mobile Security Framework) to scan APK and IPA files directly via Claude, 5ire, or any MCP-capable client.
      21
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (projects, files, analyses, reports), so agents can generally tell them apart. The main overlap risk is between appknox_cicheck and appknox_dastcheck, which both check vulnerabilities against a risk threshold but for static vs dynamic scans, which could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The appknox_ prefix is consistent, but the suffix pattern is highly varied: bare nouns (organizations, projects, files), verbs (upload, whoami), compound nouns (cicheck, sarif), and noun_verb pairs (reports_create, reports_download). There is no predictable verb_noun convention, making the naming feel chaotic.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for a mobile app security platform. Each tool serves a distinct part of the workflow—auth, orgs, projects, files, upload, checks, vulnerability details, and reports—without unnecessary bloat or excessive granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle: authenticate, navigate orgs/projects/files, upload packages, perform static and dynamic checks, view vulnerability details, and generate/download reports. Minor gaps exist, such as update/delete operations for projects or files, but agents can work around these for typical scanning workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources