Skip to main content
Glama
appcreationsca

BumpGuard

by appcreationsca
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to BumpGuard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RegressGuard

      Bharath-code
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      RegressGuard is an MCP server that records a known-good baseline and lets AI coding agents detect regressions (broken API contracts, failing tests, schema changes) during their edit loop, allowing them to self-correct before committing.
      1
      MIT

    • gristmill-mcp

      mattshuttle
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that inspects AI-generated code and returns a deterministic list of structural and safety violations, so an AI coding agent can fix its own output before the code lands.
      2
      MIT
    • Asynthetic by asyntheticai

      Asyntheticofficial

      asyntheticai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI coding agents verified migration maps: exactly what breaks between two versions of a library and how to fix it, from hand-curated maps with source citations - instead of hallucinated answers from stale training data
      5
      56 npm
      Business Source 1.1

    • argot

      get-tmonier
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local guardrail MCP server that checks agent-written code against a repo's own patterns — learned statistically from its git history, no LLM.
      6
      50
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: checking imports, upgrade impact, version diffs, language listing, symbol listing, and snippet verification. Descriptions explicitly differentiate overlapping use cases, e.g., diff_versions vs. check_upgrade.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., check_import, list_symbols, verify_snippet), making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cover the core concerns of dependency safety and API verification without redundancy or excessive granularity. The scope is well-matched to the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers import checking, upgrade impact, API diffing, symbol discovery, and snippet verification. Minor gaps exist (e.g., batch checks or automated fixes), but the core workflow for safe dependency bumps is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources