kit_get_broadcast
Retrieve details of a specific broadcast by providing its ID from your Kit account.
Instructions
Get a specific broadcast by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| broadcast_id | Yes | The broadcast ID |
Retrieve details of a specific broadcast by providing its ID from your Kit account.
Get a specific broadcast by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| broadcast_id | Yes | The broadcast ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic operation, omitting details on side effects, permissions, error handling, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is efficient for a simple get tool. However, it lacks any structured breakdown or additional context that could enhance usability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a low-complexity, single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but minimal. It does not hint at the return value or any special behavior, leaving the agent to infer from the tool name.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the description 'The broadcast ID' already in the schema. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, resulting in baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Get a specific broadcast by ID' clearly states verb (Get), resource (broadcast), and qualifier (by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like kit_list_broadcasts and kit_create_broadcast.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Usage is implied for retrieving a single broadcast by ID, but no exclusions or context are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aplaceforallmystuff/mcp-kit'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server