sonarr_search_episode
Search for specific TV episodes by ID to trigger automatic download in Sonarr.
Instructions
Trigger a search for specific episode(s)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| episodeIds | Yes | Episode ID(s) to search for |
Search for specific TV episodes by ID to trigger automatic download in Sonarr.
Trigger a search for specific episode(s)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| episodeIds | Yes | Episode ID(s) to search for |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral details like whether the search is remote, asynchronous, or triggers downloads. The burden falls entirely on the description, which is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single clear sentence with no waste. It is appropriately concise, though additional context could be beneficial.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the basic purpose. However, it could include what a 'search' entails (e.g., triggering a download search) and any side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it triggers a search for specific episodes. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like sonarr_search or sonarr_search_missing, which may cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sonarr_search_missing or sonarr_search. The description lacks context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aplaceforallmystuff/mcp-arr'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server