remove_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior on its own. It states that the tool modifies a registry and a Caddy site and triggers a reload, which are relevant side effects. However, it does not mention irreversibility, permission requirements, or failure modes, so it's partially transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with the core action front-loaded. There is zero wasted text, and every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter removal tool, the description covers the essential steps (remove, reload) but leaves out important context like whether the domain must exist, what happens on failure, or any safety caveats. Given the lack of an output schema and annotations, it is minimally complete but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must explain the 'name' parameter. The phrase 'Hapus nama.test' implies that 'name' is the domain to remove, which gives basic meaning. However, it lacks format, examples, or edge-case details, so it only partially compensates for the gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (remove) and the resource (domain from registry and Caddy site) with a reload step. It is concise and unambiguous, though it does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like add_domain, so it's not a full 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of conditions, prerequisites, or when not to use it. The name implies removal but that's not explicit enough for an agent to make a confident choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.