APISIX-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to APISIX-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA server that enables Large Language Models to discover and interact with REST APIs defined by OpenAPI specifications through the Model Context Protocol.4,953 npm297MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges MCP clients with local LLM services, enabling seamless integration with MCP-compatible applications through standard tools like chat completion, model listing, and health checks.-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes over 200+ APIs from API.market as MCP resources, allowing large language models to discover and interact with various APIs through natural language commands.3435 npm4MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA FastMCP-based Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides unified access to multiple AI APIs including OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, and xAI Grok.58 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows AI agents to interact with Apache DolphinScheduler through a standardized protocol, enabling AI-driven workflow management.29Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA proof-of-concept implementation that enables Amazon Bedrock AgentCore to interact with AWS Lambda functions and REST APIs through the Model Context Protocol. It provides a gateway for protocol translation and supports direct server implementation using the FastMCP framework.-
TDQS
Scored across 32 tools
Most tools are clearly distinguished by their target resource (e.g., consumer, route, plugin) and action (create, update, delete), with minimal overlap. However, some tools like 'create_or_update_consumer' and 'update_consumer_group' could cause confusion about whether they handle similar entities, and 'delete_resource' is overly generic compared to specific delete tools like 'delete_secret'.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_route, update_service, delete_secret) with clear actions and resources. Minor deviations exist, such as 'send_request_to_gateway' using a longer phrase and 'get_all_plugin_names' including 'all', but overall the conventions are predictable and readable.
With 32 tools, the count is on the high side for an API management server, bordering on heavy. While APISIX has many components (consumers, routes, plugins, etc.), this many tools might overwhelm agents or indicate fragmentation. It's reasonable but could benefit from consolidation or better scoping.
The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle coverage for APISIX's domain, including consumers, routes, services, plugins, SSL, and more. It supports create, update, delete, and get operations across all major resources, with no obvious gaps for core API gateway management tasks.