delete_section
Remove a specified program section from a task by providing the task name and section name.
Instructions
Delete a program section from a task.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task | Yes | ||
| section | Yes |
Remove a specified program section from a task by providing the task name and section name.
Delete a program section from a task.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task | Yes | ||
| section | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description bears full burden. It only says 'delete', omitting any behavioral traits like reversibility, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence is concise but severely under-specified. It lacks critical information despite being short.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, output schema, or parameter details, the description is incomplete. The agent cannot reliably invoke this tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Two required parameters with 0% schema coverage and no explanation in description. 'task' and 'section' are undefined, leaving the agent guessing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'program section from a task'. It distinguishes from siblings like create_section (create) and read_section (read).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., delete vs modify). No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/apexsotjo-blip/control-expert-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server