get_search_by_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the function, but does not mention that it is read-only, any authentication requirements, rate limits, pagination, or other behaviors. The output schema exists but is not referenced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words (10 words total). It is front-loaded with the verb and resource. Could be expanded slightly without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 6 parameters, an output schema, and many siblings, the description is too minimal. It does not mention return values, provide examples, or explain parameter relationships. The output schema's existence does not compensate for the missing description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% coverage of parameter descriptions. The overall description does not explain any of the 6 parameters (site_url, page_url, etc.) beyond implying that page_url refers to a specific page. For a tool with required parameters, this is severely lacking.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('search queries') with a clear scope ('driving traffic to a specific page URL'). This clearly distinguishes it from broader sibling tools like get_search_analytics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as get_search_analytics or get_advanced_search_analytics. The description does not include any when-to-use, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.