mempalace_add_drawer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals one behavioral trait (duplicate checking), but with no annotations, it omits side effects, failure modes, permissions, or what happens on duplicate (fail/skip/overwrite).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action, followed by a key feature. No wasted words, though a bit more structure could be beneficial.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given many sibling tools and no output schema, the description provides minimal context (duplicate check) but lacks return information and relationship to other storage tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters are documented in the schema (100% coverage), and the description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('File verbatim content into the palace'), using a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like mempalace_diary_write or mempalace_kg_add, which also store content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a duplicate check, implying a built-in safeguard, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like mempalace_get_drawer or mempalace_update_drawer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.