integrations_oauth_callback_urlPrints the redirect URL to add to OAuth app configurations for any provider, helping you set up integrations without guessing the callback address.
Print the redirect URL to add to OAuth app configurations (same for every provider)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.2.27Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a genuinely useful behavioral fact beyond the annotations: the returned URL is identical across all providers, which prevents redundant per-provider calls.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single well-formed sentence with the action front-loaded and no wasted words. Ideal size for a trivial zero-arg utility.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, read-only utility with no output schema, the description tells the agent what is produced (a redirect URL) and that it is provider-independent. Lacking only an explicit pointer to where this fits in the OAuth setup flow.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters and the schema is empty with additionalProperties=false, so there is nothing for the description to document. Per the zero-parameter baseline, this is adequate as-is.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Print the redirect URL') with a clear purpose (add to OAuth app configurations). The parenthetical '(same for every provider)' distinguishes it from the provider-specific siblings like oauth_google_configure, though it doesn't name the adjacent integrations_oauth_* tools directly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage ('to add to OAuth app configurations') but gives no explicit when-to-use guidance or routing against the many sibling tools (integrations_oauth_configure, integrations_oauth_connect, integrations_oauth_status). An agent must infer the context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.