Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation on the memory resource: search (read), write (create), and status (health check). There is no overlap in purpose and an agent can unambiguously select the right one.

All three tools follow the identical memory_<verb> pattern (memory_search, memory_write, memory_status), a fully predictable and consistent convention across the set.

Three tools is on the thin side for an operational-memory system; the narrow scope keeps it coherent, but the surface feels minimal given the domain implies richer lifecycle management.

Read (search) and create (write) are covered plus a health check, but there is no update, delete, or get-by-id operation, leaving notable gaps in the memory lifecycle as the description itself hints at an experimental/async model.