delete_dns_host_override

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals that this is a destructive action (Delete) and imposes a confirmation requirement, but it does not disclose other behavioral traits like whether the operation is reversible, authentication needs, or error behavior. Given no annotations, this is adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 10 words, front-loaded with the verb and resource. Every word is essential, with no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with an output schema, the description covers the core action and a critical requirement. However, it lacks context on error states (e.g., missing override_id) or the effect of confirm=false, which would make it more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaning to both parameters: 'by ID' ties to override_id, and 'Requires confirm=true' specifies the confirm boolean's required value. This compensates well for the missing schema descriptions, though it omits details like data format or default behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a DNS host override by ID' clearly states the specific verb (Delete) and resource (DNS host override), distinguishing it from sibling tools like add_dns_host_override and list_dns_host_overrides. The inclusion of 'Requires confirm=true' adds a precise condition without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_dhcp_static_mapping). The description does not state prerequisites (e.g., need override_id from list_dns_host_overrides) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.