io.github.antonio-castellon/mcp-telegram-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.antonio-castellon/mcp-telegram-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to read allowlisted Telegram chats and send messages as a bot, with access control, local secrets, and duplicate send protection.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients like Codex or ChatGPT to securely receive, acknowledge, and send Telegram messages with durable delivery guarantees and idempotency.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server enables agents to connect to Telegram accounts and bots to search chats, review unread messages, build sourced digests, inspect media and documents, and prepare or execute confirmed actions with scoped permissions.1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with Telegram user accounts, providing tools for messaging, contacts, groups, channels, and media management through the Telegram API.853-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Telegram accounts through MCP, supporting messaging, contacts, groups, media, and admin functions.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to securely access and manage Telegram accounts, chats, messages, media, and contacts, with tiered permissions, write controls, and local caching.22Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Telegram API endpoint: identity, chat info, sending messages, editing buttons, answering callbacks, and fetching updates. The only minor ambiguity is between send_message and edit_reply_markup since both handle buttons, but their purposes (new vs. existing message) are clearly different.
All tools follow a consistent 'telegram_' prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_me, get_chat, send_message). The naming is predictable and consistent across the entire set.
With 6 tools, the server covers the essential operations for a Telegram bridge without unnecessary bloat. Each tool serves a clear purpose in the core workflow of a bot, making the count well-scoped.
The server covers identity, chat info, sending, editing, callback answers, and updates. However, it lacks common operations like deleting messages or sending media/files. Also, the update loop relies heavily on the agent, and there is no method to manage webhooks, but the core messaging loop is covered.