ashby-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ashby-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects your Ashby recruiting data to Claude, enabling natural language queries and management of candidates, applications, jobs, interviews, offers, and team information.19 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceConnects Claude to the Ashby ATS to manage the hiring pipeline through natural conversation. It enables users to browse jobs, manage candidate profiles, track applications, and coordinate interview stages.245MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching candidates, jobs, and applications in the Ashby ATS, retrieving detailed profiles and postings, and supports natural-language queries through Pipeworx's ask_pipeworx.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server implementation that enables LLMs to interact with Ashby's Applicant Tracking System, allowing management of candidates, jobs, applications, interviews, and analytics through the Model Context Protocol.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with Ashby's Applicant Tracking System for managing candidates, jobs, applications, and interviews. It supports data operations, batch processing, and access to pipeline analytics and reporting.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search candidates, view job postings, and manage applications in Greenhouse ATS via natural language queries.4 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: searching candidates, getting candidate/application details, listing applications, submitting/retrieving feedback, listing jobs, getting interview schedules, and adding notes. No two tools have overlapping purposes, making selection unambiguous.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., search_candidates, get_candidate, list_jobs). Verbs like search, get, list, submit, and add are clearly differentiated and used predictably across the set.
Nine tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for an ATS integration. The scope is tight and focused on recruiting workflows—searching, viewing, feedback, and scheduling—without unnecessary bloat or missing core actions.
The tool surface covers the main candidate and application lifecycle: search, retrieve, list, provide feedback, view interview schedule, and add notes. Minor gaps exist, such as no job detail retrieval or application status updates, but these are not critical for common recruiting tasks.