Skip to main content
Glama
anthonygozzini

GuardBot

by anthonygozzini
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to GuardBot

  • safeagent-token-safety

    Aigen-Protocol
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
    1
    MIT

  • VetAgent

    jakegu1
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Pre-trade token safety check for AI agents. Simulates a sell before you buy, then reports honeypot, tax, liquidity, pair age, same-ticker impersonation and owner powers as one low/medium/high/unknown verdict. Fail-closed: when a critical check cannot run it answers unknown rather than guessing low. Publishes its own measured error rate with the benchmark harness in the repo.
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • onchain-forensics

    philpof102-svg
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides on-chain forensic checks for evaluating transaction risks, including token verification, rug-pull detection, and fund tracing, using public blockchain endpoints.
    12
    39 npm
    MIT

  • CryptoGuard

    gpartin
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Per-transaction crypto trade validator for AI agents, validates trades with PROCEED/CAUTION/BLOCK verdicts, scans tokens for anomalies, detects rug pulls, and searches across DEXes. Powered by WaveGuard physics engine with deterministic PDE-based analysis.
    5
    1
    MIT
  • pnllabs-mcp by PnLlabs

    pnllabs-mcpofficial

    PnLlabs
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Gives AI trading agents machine-readable trust and risk verdicts on Solana by checking whether a wallet's realized PnL makes it worth copying, where its funds came from, whether a token is structurally safe, and what a given trade size would really cost in slippage. Exposes these four checks as MCP tools callable against a hosted x402 pay-per-call API, so agents can hard-stop bad trades without RPC keys, signup, or local setup.
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct responsibility: check_approvals lists existing approvals, simulate_revoke tests a specific revocation, and check_token evaluates a token's safety. The workflow relationship between check_approvals and simulate_revoke is clearly separated by read vs. simulate.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names follow a clean verb_noun pattern, with check_approvals and check_token sharing the 'check' prefix. simulate_revoke is the only deviation, but the verb accurately reflects its action and is still in the same structural style.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools is well-scoped for a guard-focused server: inspect approvals, simulate a revoke, and vet a token before trading. Each tool covers a distinct user need with no redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the core workflows: discovering risky approvals, proving a revoke works before signing, and detecting malicious tokens. A minor gap is the lack of any execution/broadcast capability, but the tools intentionally stop at simulation and calldata generation.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources