Skip to main content
Glama
anthonybono21-cloud

Leapfrog MCP

by anthonybono21-cloud
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Leapfrog MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BrowserMCP Secure

      manishpandey9
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security-hardened MCP server that gives AI assistants full control over your real browser session, supporting 36 tools for navigation, data extraction, monitoring, and more.
      MIT

    • Reasonix Browser Bridge

      liutingqiu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Browser automation for AI agents: tabs, cookies, arbitrary JS execution (via CDP, bypasses CSP), screenshots, downloads, proxy switching, data cleanup. Chrome & Edge multi-browser, full permissions, zero configuration. 25+ MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Browser

      wgarrido
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants browse the web through your real Chrome with your cookies, sessions, and fingerprint, avoiding bot detection and CAPTCHAs. Enables web browsing, content extraction, and multi-step workflows via persistent tabs.
      15
      4 npm
      3
      MIT

    • UBA MCP Server

      kezhu-ai
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with a real browser environment for web automation, memory, and secure credential management through 15 MCP tools.
      15
      MIT

    • browser-store

      bysking
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing and controlling multiple isolated Chrome/Edge browser instances, exposing tools for navigation, screenshots, clicking, form filling, and JavaScript execution to AI clients.
      3 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, but there are confusing overlaps: session_list and pool_status both list active sessions, and session_list_profiles and profile_list appear to list the same saved profiles. network_log and api_discover also overlap somewhat in observing traffic, though their descriptions help separate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tool names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern with domain prefixes like session_, tab_, profile_, network_, and api_. However, several names are noun-like rather than command-like (pool_status, console_log, session_memory, domain_knowledge), and profile_warm is inverted. These deviations are minor and the overall pattern remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well above the comfortable range for an MCP server and reaches the 'too many' category. The collection includes tight clusters of overlapping functionality, such as two profile-listing tools and two session-listing tools, which increases maintenance and learning burdens without adding proportional value. Many tools are useful, but the set could be consolidated below 25.

    Completeness5/5

    The server provides thorough coverage across the browser automation lifecycle: session management, navigation, interaction, snapshots/diffs, waits, tabs, network interception, profilers, authentication, API discovery, export/replay, human intervention, and traceability. Almost every task an agent would need in a browser drive has a direct tool, and any remaining gaps are just workarounds via execute or extract.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources