Skip to main content
Glama
ansys

Ansys CFX-MCP

Official
by ansys

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ansys CFX-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with ANSYS Mechanical simulation software via gRPC, allowing users to manage geometry, mesh, boundary conditions, solve analyses, and generate reports through MCP-compatible AI clients.
      17
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for automating ANSYS HFSS simulations, enabling persistent connections, modeling, simulation setup, and S-parameter extraction through AI assistants.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Automates OpenFOAM CFD simulations via MCP, enabling AI agents to mesh, run, and post-process cases from natural language prompts without any API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Voice-driven CFD MCP server that enables natural language setup, execution, and analysis of OpenFOAM simulations, with results exportable to ParaView.
      16
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles: connection lifecycle (connect/disconnect/session_status), code execution/validation (run_code/validate_code), workflow actions, and model context queries. The main potential confusion is between run_code and cfx_workflow, since cfx_workflow actions could also be performed via custom Python, but the descriptions provide enough routing guidance to separate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly follow a clean snake_case pattern with imperative verbs (connect, disconnect, run_code, validate_code). session_status and cfx_workflow/cfx_model_context are more noun-like, but overall the naming is consistent enough and predictable across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is a well-scoped size for this server's purpose. Each tool covers a distinct functional layer: backend connection, live code execution, validation, high-level workflow control, and model introspection, without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main CFX interaction lifecycle: connect, run custom code, validate, drive workflows, and inspect model context. run_code provides an escape hatch for arbitrary PyCFX operations, though a few high-level conveniences like explicit solver output retrieval or session list/close operations are absent, which is a minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive