Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to whiteboard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A shared whiteboard for you and your AI agent I wanted my AI agent and me to be able to point at the same thing. Any MCP-capable agent can read the canvas, draw on it, drop thought bubbles, animate elements, and react when you sketch something.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to draw on a self-hosted canvas by creating and editing frames, text, shapes, images, and SVGs with auto-layout, then inspecting, exporting, and sharing the results. Also supports live viewing of agent edits, pinned comments, screenshots, and revision history so people and agents can collaborate on boards.
      824 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and draw on self-hosted Excalidraw boards, listing and creating boards, adding, updating and deleting elements such as labeled shapes and connecting arrows, and finding library icons to place. Changes appear live on any board the user has open.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets Claude, Codex, Cursor and other MCP clients draw hand-drawn Excalidraw diagrams on a local whiteboard, saving them as real .excalidraw files the agent can inspect, revise and undo. It also provides rendering to PNG, SVG import, and docs so agents can self-serve setup and troubleshooting.
      19
      75 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the whiteboard workflow: opening, reading, drawing, deleting, focusing, screenshotting, Mermaid import, exporting, saving, searching, and guidance. The potentially overlapping pairs (read vs. screenshot, save vs. export, search vs. open) are explicitly differentiated by their descriptions. An agent should be able to select the right tool without confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use the same snake_case canvas_ prefix and a short action/object suffix. Although some suffixes are nouns (screenshot, mermaid, guide), the overall pattern is highly predictable. There is no mixing of camelCase, inconsistent prefixes, or chaotic verb styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    The server exposes 11 tools, which is well within the appropriate range for a feature-rich interactive whiteboard. Each tool appears to earn its place by covering a distinct part of the drawing, sharing, and explanation workflow. The set does not feel bloated or thin.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: find/open a board, read its state, draw/update/delete elements, import Mermaid, focus attention, screenshot for layout verification, export to file, save to a library, and search saved/other boards. Guidance is provided for the human-facing explanation workflow. No obvious CRUD or workflow gaps remain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive