A
licenseA
qualityF
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude with Google Tasks, allowing users to manage task lists and tasks directly through Claude interface.
15
56
48
MIT
Google Keep MCP
by anmolsahu2k
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Keep MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants like Claude to interact with Evernote, enabling them to create, search, read, and manage notes through natural language.4-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Keep that enables managing notes, checklists, and labels through tools like search, create, update, and delete.18-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for seamless Evernote integration, enabling note creation, editing, searching, and notebook/tag management via Claude.6432GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to fully manage Google Calendar, including events, calendars, sharing, and availability checks through natural language.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to read from, append to, and format text in Google Documents programmatically.2,961656MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 20 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool maps to a clear resource and action: notes, checklist items, labels, media, and lifecycle states are all separate. Even closely related operations like delete_note vs trash_note are explicitly differentiated by permanence and reversibility.
Naming Consistency4/5
The set consistently uses snake_case verb_noun names such as get_note, create_list, update_list_item, and add_label_to_note. The main inconsistency is the bare verb 'find' instead of something like search_notes, but the rest of the naming is highly predictable.
Tool Count3/5
At 20 tools, the server sits in the borderline-heavy range and covers a broad amount of Google Keep functionality. The operations are not redundant, but the surface could be tightened by consolidating some state toggles or label operations.
Completeness4/5
The server covers note CRUD, trash/restore, pin/archive, color, checklist item operations, and label attachment and management. Notable gaps are the lack of a label rename/update operation and no way to add media to a note, but core Keep workflows are well represented.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues