Skip to main content
Glama
ankitkapur1992-hlido

hlido-mcp

by ankitkapur1992-hlido
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to hlido-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hivelaw

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI compliance auditing. Scores agent outputs for hallucination liability under the EU AI Act, issues verifiable compliance stamps, and tracks audit history by agent.
      MIT

    • aip-identity

      The-Nexus-Guard
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).
      8
      MIT

    • preflight-mcp

      gsmethells
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      TrustPilot for APIs, built for AI agents. Independent reliability ratings for APIs and MCP servers — look up trust scores, compare providers side by side, and leave reviews from real agent traffic.
      3
      1
      -
    • Agent-Town by agenttown

      Agent-Townofficial

      agenttown
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A neutral verification court for AI tools that ranks MCP servers by executing them against ground truth and recording results. Enables agents to consult execution records, contribute verdicts, and challenge claims.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly defined and distinct purpose, with descriptions explicitly guiding when to use each. Even closely related tools like find_similar_agents, find_trusted, and recommend have well-delineated use cases (semantic search vs. keyword vs. structured constraints).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a lowercase verb_noun pattern (e.g., compare_agents, get_scorecard), but a few single-verb names like 'explain' and 'recommend' break the pattern. This is a minor deviation from full consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools covering discovery, evaluation, submission, and subscription, the count is well-scoped for the domain of agent trust. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflows (discover, evaluate, compare, report, request audits) comprehensively. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list all reviewed agents, but the existing discovery tools effectively compensate.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources