Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
jury-mcp

jury-mcp

by anixes
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to jury-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • advisor-mcp

      Fan-chou
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-capable coding agent to request an independent, read-only second opinion from a stronger model at consequential decision points such as planning, debugging, risk review, and handoff. It exposes consult, session-state, reset, and health tools over stdio or authenticated Streamable HTTP, with explicit context, structured validated advice, session continuity, call budgets, and secret redaction.
      5
      MIT

    • RepoPulse MCP Server

      miriyaladhanwinn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes code-review and issue-triage tools to AI assistants over stdio, letting them evaluate unified pull-request diffs for maintainer remarks, slice diffs into categorized AST hunks, and classify GitHub issues by priority while synthesizing minimal reproduction stubs.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • molesignal mcp

      molesignal mcpofficial

      molesignal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Serves MoleSignal's tools over stdio to AI agent tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, VS Code, or Gemini CLI, enabling them to query logs, metrics, traces, incidents, approvals, deployments, and other capabilities under the user's permissions and organization policy.
      377 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • a0

      Joe-Simo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to open, edit, check, run, emit, and save source programs through structured, revision-checked tools over stdio, confining paths to the launch root and returning diagnostics with fixes for rejected edits.
      5 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools target distinct modes: implementation planning, code/diff review, and targeted design advice. jury_plan and jury_ask both involve architectural consultation, so there is some potential overlap, but their outputs and use cases are differentiated well enough.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the same jury_ prefix followed by a clear action verb: jury_plan, jury_review, jury_ask. The naming is predictable and consistent throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a multi-model jury server: one for planning, one for review, and one for targeted advice. Each tool has a clear purpose and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core consultation workflows: planning, code review, and architectural advice. Minor gaps exist around session management, follow-up deliberation, or jury configuration, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources