Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to PenTest MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered cybersecurity automation platform with 150+ security tools and 12+ autonomous AI agents for penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, and bug bounty hunting. Enables comprehensive security testing through intelligent tool selection and automated workflows.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive security testing and penetration testing through natural language conversations with 92+ tools for reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, web application testing, OSINT, and reporting. Designed for authorized bug bounty hunting and security assessments.
      43
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language-driven security testing by orchestrating multiple pen-testing tools through MCP, with automated scan execution and AI-assisted vulnerability summarization.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates 7 security tools (nmap, nuclei, dirsearch, sqlmap, hydra, Acunetix, Metasploit) via MCP protocol for AI-assisted penetration testing with enterprise-grade safety features.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An automated penetration testing framework that enables intelligent security assessments through reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and controlled exploitation. Features AI-driven workflow management with comprehensive reporting for authorized security testing.
      25
      27
      8
      7
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous AI agents and penetration testers to conduct authorized security audits with persistent cross-session memory, zero-trust secret scrubbing, dynamic OWASP/ASVS checklists, and hallucination-free exploit PoC generation from captured traffic.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes: nmap/masscan both scan ports, sslyze/testssl both audit TLS, ffuf/gobuster/wfuzz all fuzz for directories, and subfinder/amass/dnsrecon all do subdomain/DNS enumeration. The descriptions are lean and don't clarify when to choose one over the other.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names are a mix of raw external tool names (nmap, sqlmap, gobuster) and server-specific snake_case verbs (init_session, get_report, quick_scan). This makes the naming pattern unpredictable and inconsistent across the API surface.

    Tool Count2/5

    31 tools is too many for a focused MCP server, especially when several are near-duplicates (subfinder/amass/dnsrecon, ffuf/gobuster/wfuzz, sslyze/testssl). A consolidated surface with fewer, higher-level scan operations would be easier for an agent to use.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers reconnaissance, scanning, web fuzzing, TLS testing, secret detection, and report generation, which is solid for web-focused pentesting. However, session lifecycle support is thin (init_session/get_report only) and there are no explicit post-exploitation or broader infrastructure testing tools, leaving noticeable gaps for a general 'PenTest' role.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues