remove_from_shopping_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are not provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It states 'Take a row off entirely' which implies destructive, irreversible removal, but does not mention whether the action is reversible or if there are any side effects. It doesn't contradict any annotations, but could add more detail about what happens after removal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the core action. It includes necessary context and parameter explanation without unnecessary details. The Args section is minimal but sufficient, though arguably the parameter explanation could be integrated into the body for better flow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description covers what an agent needs: the action, when to use it, and how to specify the item. It does not describe edge cases like if the item doesn't exist, but that may be beyond the scope for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema coverage at 0%, the description must explain the parameter. It does so explicitly: 'Product name or note text, as shown by list_shopping_list', adding meaning beyond the schema's mere 'item' string, clarifying the expected format and source.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it removes a row from the shopping list entirely, using the specific verb 'Take' and resource 'shopping list'. It distinguishes itself from check_off_shopping_item, which is a sibling, by noting that removal is for items added by mistake or no longer needed, not for purchased items.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use: for items added by mistake or no longer needed. It also clearly states when NOT to use it: if the item was bought, prefer check_off_shopping_item (and add_stock) for record-keeping, explicitly naming the alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.