list_store_bots

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond the tool name: sorting by popularity and authentication requirement. However, it does not disclose pagination behavior, rate limits, or output structure. With no annotations, it partially fulfills transparency but lacks comprehensive detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that conveys the essential purpose. Every word is necessary and there is no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain return format, pagination mechanics (e.g., what 'page' string means), or authentication specifics. More detail is needed for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75%, with three out of four parameters described in the schema. The tool description does not add any additional meaning to parameters. The 'page' parameter lacks a schema description and is not addressed in the tool description, so the description fails to compensate for this gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'bots in the community store', and distinguishes by specifying 'sorted by popularity (install count)'. It differentiates from siblings like 'list_public_store_bots' by noting it is an authenticated endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description mentions 'authenticated endpoint' which implies context, but does not specify when not to use or compare to similar tools like 'list_public_store_bots'. Siblings suggest multiple list tools, but no differentiation is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.