Skip to main content
Glama
animalnots

Human-In-the-Loop MCP Server

by animalnots

Related Servers

Alternatives to Human-In-the-Loop MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with humans through intuitive GUI dialogs, supporting text input, choices, confirmations, and information displays.
      6
      163
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through interactive GUI dialogs with quiz-style questions, supporting multiple choice and free-form responses for clarification, decisions, and knowledge extraction.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables a local LLM to ask the user for guidance via a native desktop pop-up dialog, with configurable options and multiple-choice or free-text input.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask human operators questions through polished browser dialogs, supporting text/choice/confirmation inputs and file attachments.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to request human input through native macOS dialogs for clarifying questions and user interactions.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables human-in-the-loop interaction for AI coding workflows through native desktop dialogs that present route choices, text input, and image annotation capabilities when AI assistants encounter decision points.
      1
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: input types (single-line, multi-line, choice), display (info, confirmation), and health check. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun pattern (get_*, show_*), but health_check deviates slightly. Overall pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for human-in-the-loop interactions, covering essential input, output, and status checking without excess.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers all core HITL interactions (input, choice, confirmation, info display). Minor gaps like file selection or progress indicators, but sufficient for typical use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues