Skip to main content
Glama
aniketbiswas

Obsidian MCP Server

by aniketbiswas
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Obsidian MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Obsidian MCP Server

      kirby-k-0723
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, write, search, and navigate Obsidian vault notes with support for CRUD operations, full-text search, graph navigation, daily notes, and frontmatter management.
      2,778 npm
      -

    • obsidian-mcp-pro

      christian-german
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with comprehensive access to Obsidian vaults, enabling reading, writing, searching, tagging, linking, canvas manipulation, and semantic search through 41 tools.
      -

    • obsidian-mcp

      StevenStavrakis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults, providing tools for reading, creating, editing and managing notes and tags.
      2,778 npm
      733
      MIT

    • Obsidian MCP Server

      sunub
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to explore, search, and manage local Obsidian vault documents with tools for document search, automatic frontmatter property generation, and attachment organization.
      5
      20 npm
      2
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes: there are six different search tools (search_notes, simple_search, search_by_tag, search_in_folder, find_notes_by_name, search_with_context) and five content-edit tools (update_note, replace_in_note, insert_under_heading, append_to_note, prepend_to_note). While descriptions provide distinctions, an agent may struggle to choose the right one for a given task.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern with underscores, but verbs are inconsistent (list vs. get vs. find vs. search). A few tools like daily_journal_entry, daily_standup, and quick_capture deviate from the verb-first pattern, making the naming system mixed but still readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 52 tools, this is far beyond the typical well-scoped range. Even for a complex application like Obsidian, the sheer number creates unnecessary cognitive load and makes tool selection more difficult. This qualifies as an extreme mismatch.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset is highly comprehensive, covering note CRUD, advanced search, frontmatter/tag management, daily/periodic notes, templates, backlinks, graph data, and command execution. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no move/rename note, no folder creation/deletion), but these are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources