A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceModel Context Protocol server that standardizes tool discovery, execution, and context management for AI applications.
MIT
Cloudivo MCP
by anielk
Related Servers
Alternatives to Cloudivo MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceThis server implements the Model Context Protocol to facilitate meaningful interaction and understanding development between humans and AI through structured tools and progressive interaction patterns.57-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides access to ACI.dev functions (tools) through either direct app-specific tools or a unified interface with dynamic tool discovery and execution based on user intent.253MIT
Apideck MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server422317MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server that implements the Model Context Protocol, providing a standardized way to connect AI models to different data sources and tools.711MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUnified control plane and runtime for the Model Context Protocol ecosystem, enabling plugin management, configuration, permissions, and API gateway services.201MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools are completely distinct: one checks server health, the other creates tickets. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency2/5
The naming pattern is inconsistent: 'system.health' uses a noun, while 'ticket.create' uses a verb. While both use dot notation, the verb/noun mismatch makes the naming style confusing.
Tool Count2/5
With only 2 tools for a server that includes a ticket engine, the tool set feels too thin. A ticket engine typically needs more operations, and the server's purpose appears underestimated.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface is severely limited: only ticket creation is supported, with no listing, retrieval, or update/delete operations for tickets. The system.health tool is fine but doesn't contribute to a complete workflow.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues